Risk Identification & Risk reduction program3.jpg

Risk Identification and Risk Reduction Program

The importance of writing a food safety plan, a RAMP plan, a HACCP or a risk assessment to mitigate risks and improve the safety of raw drinking milk (RDM).

 

Introduction

In Australia, we know a lot about industrial dairy but next to nothing about producing raw drinking milk in regulated systems. There are many misconceptions. Some may be in denial about the measures that have to be taken to ensure a top quality raw dairy product. Or they may just have no comprehension of how vast the difference between the two systems can be. These producers will have to be regulated to do the right thing, because they may not be willing to do it voluntarily. For this reason, we have decided to follow in the footsteps of the Raw Milk Institute and be very transparent. Raw milk from goats is legal to produce in four Australian states. These dairies have been doing well for some years. Regulated raw drinking milk (RDM) also flourishes in many other countries, some for more than a decade. Regulated raw milk can be a safe low-risk food when done well. Let us look at this objectively and question whether it is that hard to install regulations for raw milk from cows, sheep, goats, buffalo, and camels? Let us play our part in enabling the international raw milk community to grow. Some farmers are ready to start producing raw drinking milk under a regulated system in Australia. They have studied world best practice guidelines, and they already farm differently from the industrial model. Dairy farmers who currently produce for the industrial milk market may have to learn how to farm a little differently.  

certified raw milk australia victoria melbourne

When raw milk first became popular in the United States sometime after 2007, there were many incidences of illness because farmers did not understand how to do raw milk well and many states had no regulation or guidelines. The Raw Milk Institute was founded in 2010 and thanks to education, and an expectation of testing many farmers are now on track. There are many levels of risk on the farm and regulating the industry has many benefits. Some of the practices that can make a big difference, and those that can be applied to all farmers, are good candidates to add as mandatory requirements in guidelines for the production of RDM.

Australia is very fortunate. There is no need to reinvent the wheel because many other countries have paved the way with regulation and guidelines. Remember: no food can be produced to be 100 percent safe. After carefully studying the different international regulatory approaches however, it has become evident that some of them cannot successfully deal with all of the potential risks and they leave room for error. This is disadvantageous for the global raw milk movement, especially since it can be avoided. Consider the following: 

  • New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries seems to consider the raw drinking milk its system produces as high risk in this press release. There is a reason for concern about this system as described in the Feed risk category.
  • The Food Standards Agency in the UK recently concluded in a risk assessment that the controls on the RDM their system has been producing up until the start of 2018, is now considered medium risk (for RDM) and changes will be made to the system. One of the most significant changes will be the duplication of Northern Ireland's current RDM requirement that all licensed producers have a HACCP plan for England & Wales as well. 
  • The Raw Milk Institute consider its RDM system as low risk, and this is reflected in the track record of the RAWMI-listed farmers. RAWMI's Risk Assessment Management Plan is a success story with a ten year track record.

We have decided to follow in the footsteps of the Raw Milk Institute in California and increase food safety via the writing of individualised food safety plans, also called RAMP plans. It is very similar to a HACCP plan. We understand that Australian regulators may decide to write their own standards/regulation because process is what policymakers are good at. The following tools however is very useful and can be used as complementary to rules or guidelines:

  1. The Risk Assessment Management Plan (RAMP) manages the entire process "from grass to glass". With this holistic approach, farmers can become aware of an array of issues not previously considered. This is valuable because Australia is a very risk-averse country. 
  2. The RAMP approach also has built-in operational strategies to help farmers to run their raw dairy business sensibly via the use of Standard Operating Procedures.  
  3. The 11 risk categories of the Risk Identification and Risk Reduction Program explores the tools that can help dairy farmers to write food safety plans, also called RAMP plans, for producing raw drinking milk (RDM). This approach is a valuable contribution to current world best practice. It is based on how systems in nature come together and operate together, because true intelligence operates on whole system recognition. It explores the interconnectedness of many systems. It endeavours to understand the value of nature and natural ecosystem services that contribute to food safety.

The 11 risk categories also contain many examples of how raw milk producers overseas are successfully implementing unique science-based strategies. We feel these examples from experienced pioneers achieving amazing results in particular fields have value. The information should be available to study to create an understanding of how food safety is increased the biological way, with tangible results. We encourage farmers to explore these practices and decide for themselves which they would like to incorporate on their own farms.

Raw milk from cows for human consumption is currently not allowed in Australia unless you own the animal, but laws may soon be changed. We want dairy farmers to have a good understanding well in advance. 

Raw Drinking Milk:  A different kind of lifestyle on the farm

Producing raw milk that is suitable for consuming in the unprocessed state is going to require a new perspective. Dairies producing RDM often milk only once a day, they enjoy low input biological farming and lots of social interaction with consumers. They also have to pay scrupulous attention to the health of the animals, cleanliness of the milking area, the milking equipment, the processing area and the handling of the product. The required sanitation and hygiene must be achieved. This is not negotiable. There also has to be an emphasis on soil fertility, regenerative farming, a rotational grazing program and keeping the animals away from potential sources of harmful bacteria and animal diseases. Cutting corners may result in lower milk quality, shorter shelf life, more vet care, more pathogen testing etc. There is no hiding shortcuts or mistakes. 

Farmers have to learn a new system. It's not complicated but it is different from the industrial dairy model. Farmers are going to have to learn how to produce the healthiest, diverse species grazing material possible by increasing the conditions for soil microbes and carbon. They will benefit from learning that "microbes within the soil improve the ability of plants to absorb nutrients and resist drought, disease and pests." Soil fertility is increased, but there will also be more minerals available in the plants that will contribute to super healthy animals. Animals will be more resistant to bacterial infections like Mycoplasma Bovis, Mycobacterium Bovis (tuberculosis), Brucellosis and Q-fever. Mineral deficiencies can be

managed by looking at some new science-based holistic understandings. Farmers will learn that feeds given to cows in industrial systems can carry high risks if given to cows in RDM systems. What is standard for industrial dairy systems cannot automatically be suitable for RDM systems. It will be useful to explore how systems that promote vast amounts of beneficial, diverse species microbes inadvertently create safer raw milk. It is also essential to understand how the use of chemicals like herbicides and synthetic fertilisers can kill soil microbiome. Some agrochemicals may even result in the targeting and elimination of beneficial microbes and allowing more pathogens to grow. Raw dairies cannot afford to take these risks. Farmers may come to see why following the example of the raw milk movement's many pioneers can be very useful. They may also want to implement an intense rotational grazing program to cultivate knee-high fresh pastures, to avoid overgrazing of favourite plants, preserving plant diversity, allow the soil to rest properly, to eliminate the need for antibiotics and other agrochemicals etc. Fortunately, overseas examples show that it can be very gratifying. 

It is up to Australian farmers to decide if this lifestyle appeals to them and if they are willing to learn and transform. We know that it can be hard for farmers to change deeply-held beliefs. We are respectful and compassionate towards this reality. Farmers can go through the 11 risk categories slowly and allow themselves to open up their perception to new ideas.  

There are two kinds of raw milk and they carry two very different risk profiles.

 

 
 

 

Background & Research

This program was written after doing research on the regulatory structures and guidelines of raw drinking milk from England and Wales, Northern Ireland, New Zealand RDM system, New Zealand's new Food Safety Template for raw milk cheese, Australia's regulations for raw milk cheese production, as well as the raw milk regulations of the US state of Washington and also the online resources from the Raw Milk Institute. In addition, we have well over 30 raw milk case studies showing the innovation and unique contribution of many pioneers in the raw milk movement. Regulation of raw milk can be good if it is regulated fairly but the 11 risk categories show that regulation and guidelines cannot cover every potential risk on the farm. The program shows that the individualised food safety plan approach of the Raw Milk Institute is very valuable to increase food safety.

 

Risk Identification and Risk Reduction Program

There are many books and guidelines on how to produce raw milk for human consumption. 

In the eleven risk categories, we will be exploring some of the practices that can make a significant impact on achieving low risk, pathogen-free raw drinking milk in a regulated system.

This program will reference to the Raw Milk Institute's Risk Assessment Management Plan, also known as RAMP. Farmers listed with the Raw Milk Institute have been using the RAMP for up to ten years; it is an individualised food safety plan. The narrative of conditions and risk reduction actions can be categorised under the following three headlines:

-   General Management Practise (GMP)

-   Standards Sanitary Operating Plan (SSOP)

-   Critical Control Point (CCP)

This system puts the control and responsibility in the hands of the producer. The farmer does not have to wait for someone else to tell them what is going wrong in their business. The RAMP is a powerful pre-meditated action plan designed to be an effective troubleshooter. For an in-depth presentation on the RAMP food safety plan, please go to the webpage Risk Assessment Management Plan. The RAMP is also used by farmers in many different countries like Canada, Italy and France.

In a recent video GAP Food Safety Educator Lindsay Gilmore said that produce food safety is almost exclusively concerned with human pathogens or microbiological contamination in the U.S.A. This is vital information.  

Pathogens are bacteria that may be harmful to human health. Success in the raw milk business depends on following world best practice guidelines to achieve consistent low risk, pathogen-free raw milk. We want to make the system so transparent that everyone can understand it. We want high school students, mothers, grandparents, industrial dairy farmers and even bureaucrats to appreciate the care, planning and diligence that goes into producing raw milk produced expressedly for human consumption.

It is impossible to achieve the elimination of food safety risk because no food can be considered 100 percent safe. However, this information can guide farmers to understand why they need a sharpened mindset with regards to food safety. These concepts may help them to make the mental effort to identify and understand the unique risks on their own farms and how to manage them. We want Australian farmers to start thinking in 'food safety language', so that when raw milk is legalised, they have the advantage to build barriers between the raw milk and the pathogens, reduce the possibility of foodborne illness and gain the respect of food safety auditors.

Like the Raw Milk Institute, the Australian Raw Milk Movement is not the raw milk police.

The purpose of the eleven risk categories is to highlight some of the practices that most enhance food safety and reduce the risk of contamination. Let's get practical.

 

11 Risk Categories:

  1. Farm Conditions

  2. Cow Health

  3. Biosecurity

  4. Water

  5. Feed

  6. Calf

  7. Milking Conditions

  8. Milking Area Management

  9. Bottling

  10. Human Factors

  11. Documentation

 

Risk Identification and Risk Reduction program Banner.jpg